BUYING & FINANCE
Real Estate Agent Commission in Japan: What Buyers Actually Pay
A Tokyo-based insider explains the real estate agent commission in Japan: the 3% + 60,000 yen cap, who pays the fee, ryote double-siding, and how to know you are represented.
On this page 6
TL;DR: In Japan, brokerage commission is capped by law at 3% + 60,000 yen + consumption tax on deals over 4 million yen, and that cap is the standard formula almost everyone charges. The buyer normally pays their side; the seller pays theirs. The thing nobody explains to foreign buyers is that one brokerage often collects from both sides (called ryote), which quietly shapes whose interests get protected. Knowing the formula and knowing who your agent actually works for are two different things.
The Formula Is Fixed, Not Negotiable Theater
Let me kill the first myth: the real estate agent commission in Japan is not a free-for-all where you haggle and the slick negotiator wins. It is capped by the Takken-gyoho (the Real Estate Brokerage Act), and the cap is a hard legal standard.
For any transaction over 4 million yen — which is basically every Tokyo deal — the maximum a brokerage may charge one side is:
- 3% of the sale price, plus 60,000 yen, plus consumption tax.
That is the famous Japan brokerage fee 3 percent plus 60000. The 60,000 yen is not a random add-on; it is the shorthand that bakes in the lower tiers (the law actually charges 5% on the first 2 million yen and 4% on the next 2 million, and “3% + 60,000” is just the tidy formula that produces the same number on anything above 4 million). On a 60 million yen apartment, that is 60,000,000 x 3% = 1,800,000, plus 60,000, = 1,860,000 yen, then add consumption tax (10% as of writing). Call it roughly 2.05 million yen for your side. This is the Japan real estate commission cap — a ceiling, not a floor.
Two honest caveats. First, it is a maximum. A brokerage is legally free to charge less, and a few discount shops do. Most charge the full cap, because at the cap the math is clean and the market tolerates it (directional, as of writing). Second, since 2024 the rules added some flexibility for genuinely cheap properties — low-price homes under a few million yen can carry a slightly higher allowable fee to make rural and akiya (vacant-house) deals worth an agent’s time. For Tokyo buyers this rarely matters, but if someone quotes you a fee that looks above the formula on a tiny property, it may be legitimate. Ask them to show you the calculation.
Who Actually Pays the Agent
Here is the question I get most from overseas buyers: who pays the agent in Japan property transactions?
Short version: each side pays its own brokerage. If you buy, you pay your buying-side fee. The seller pays their selling-side fee. There is no single “the buyer pays everything” or “the seller pays everything” convention like you sometimes see abroad. The commission becomes due on contract and is typically paid in two halves — roughly half at contract signing (keiyaku) and half at handover (hikiwatashi) — though timing varies by brokerage (directional, as of writing).
What trips people up is that the fee is per side, charged by each brokerage. So a deal can generate two full commissions: one from the buyer, one from the seller. That is normal and legal. The complication starts when those two commissions land in the same company’s pocket.
Ryote: When One Company Sits on Both Sides
This is the part the glossy buyer guides skip, and it is the single most useful thing in this article.
When one brokerage represents the seller and the buyer on the same property, it collects commission from both — known as ryote (literally “both hands”). The opposite, where your brokerage only handles your side and a different company handles the other, is katate (“one hand”).
Ryote is not illegal and not inherently evil. But think about the incentive honestly. A ryote brokerage earns double on that specific property only if that property closes with both of its clients. So it has a quiet structural reason to steer you toward the listing it already controls, and a quiet reason not to push too hard on price against its own seller-client. Japan does not have the strict, bright-line agency rules some other countries impose, and dual representation that would raise eyebrows elsewhere is routine here (directional, as of writing). There is even a well-known local practice, kakikomi, where a listing agent sits on a property to keep it in-house for the double fee rather than openly sharing it — regulators have been pushing against it, but it persists (directional, as of writing).
I am not telling you to refuse every ryote deal. Sometimes the best apartment for you is one where the listing agent is the only realistic path in. I am telling you to know when it is happening and price the conflict into how much you trust the advice.
What a Buyer’s Agent Actually Does for the Fee
If commission is roughly 3% either way, the fair question is: what do I get for it? A real buyer agent Japan chukai tesuryo (chukai tesuryo = the brokerage commission) should cover more than unlocking a door.
In a normal Tokyo purchase, a buyer’s agent earning that fee should:
- Pull the property’s history, ownership, and any liens from the toki (the legal title register), not just trust the listing sheet.
- Read the juyo jiko setsumei (the legally mandated “explanation of important matters”) before you sign and translate the landmines — boundary disputes, road-access rights, lease-land (shakuchiken) versus freehold, and for apartments the shuzenhi (the building repair-reserve fund) and whether it is dangerously underfunded.
- Flag building age against the 1981 shin-taishin (new earthquake-resistance code) line, which is a genuine fixed standard that affects financing, insurance, and resale.
- Run honest numbers on acquisition tax, the annual fixed-asset tax, and — critically for you — the cross-border tax exposure. Non-residents selling later face withholding (10.21% or 20.42% depending on circumstances), and your home country may tax the same gain. I work in real estate, not your tax adviser: confirm cross-border tax, and any SMSF or immigration angle, with a licensed professional in both countries.
- Actually negotiate against the seller — which, again, is hard to do credibly if the same firm represents the seller.
If your “agent” is doing none of this and just forwarding listings, you are paying full freight for a door-opener.
How to Know You’re Actually Represented
You verify representation the way you verify anything here: on paper.
- Check the license. Every legitimate brokerage has a takken license number (the “Governor” or “Minister” registration). Ask for it. The renewal count in that number even hints at how long they have operated.
- Ask, in writing, which side they are on. “Are you collecting commission from the seller too?” is a fair, normal question. A straight answer tells you whether you are in a ryote or katate situation.
- Get the media agreement. Formal buyer representation is documented; if no one ever asked you to sign a brokerage agreement, your “representation” is informal.
- Make them show the fee math. The cap is fixed. A trustworthy agent will write out 3% + 60,000 + tax without flinching.
None of this requires you to speak the language or distrust everyone. It requires you to ask two or three blunt questions early.
What This Means For Your Next Move
The commission itself is the predictable part — the formula is fixed and you can model it before you ever view a property. The variable that actually affects your wallet is whose interests your agent is structurally paid to protect. A buyer’s agent who only takes your side, declines the double-dip, and reads the fine print against the seller is worth the full cap. One who quietly sits on both sides may be worth less than they charge.
If you want a buyer’s side agent who tells you plainly when a deal is ryote and negotiates for you rather than the listing, Talk to us. Run your own numbers first with our tools, and if you are still deciding location, compare wards before you commit to anyone’s “perfect” listing.
Sources:
